false gospel of witness lee

The Teachings of Witness Lee: An Excerpt on Deification

What does Witness Lee teach concerning deification? Many rumors and lies have been spread concerning the teachings of Witness Lee, even to the extent that some say he has a “false gospel.” Well, if one were to go to the source and read Witness Lee’s writings in a balanced way, not taking things out of context, or distorting his words, or jumping to conclusions according to heresay, they would find that Witness Lee’s teachings are sound and Biblical. In fact, the Christian Research Institute, the very source of the rumors and lies about him, have come out to say “We Were Wrong” in an issue of the Christian Research Journal. They admit that the rumors and lies spread about Witness Lee, the Local Churches, and his teachings originated with them and became a “fountainhead of misinformation that traveled halfway around the world before the truth had a chance to get its boots on.” See for yourself HERE.

Beginning in the early 1970s Gretchen Passantino was one of the early critics of the local churches and of Witness Lee. Gretchen speaks about the CRI research team’s reassessment of the teaching of Witness Lee and the local churches, and concludes that it is “well within Christian orthodoxy” and that the members of the churches are “our brothers and sisters in Christ.”

The following excerpt is taken from Witness Lee’s Life-Study of Colossians, message 51, regarding his teachings on deification, the subjective experience of Christ, and how the Bible shows that Christ lives in His believers.

“Some Christian teachers oppose the revelation we have seen concerning the subjective experience of Christ. According to them, we deify ourselves, we make ourselves God. They claim that we teach that the self becomes the same as God and that this is self-deification. Although we definitely do not teach that we become God Himself or that we shall ever be worshipped as deity, it is nonetheless true that Christ dwells in us and that He is our life. He becomes us in our experience. As Paul says, “To me to live is Christ” (Phil. 1:21). We have pointed out that Christ cannot be our life without becoming us. Life is our very being. Hence, for Christ to be our life means that He becomes our being. For Christ to become our being is for Christ to become us.

To us, Christ is both objective and subjective. We know Christ both according to doctrine and according to experience. On the one hand, our Christ is on the throne in the heavens. On the other hand, He is in our spirit. We worship the enthroned Christ in the heavens, but we experience, enjoy, and partake of the indwelling Christ in our spirit. We are one with Him in a very subjective way. As Paul says in 1 Corinthians 6:17, “He that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.” Christ is subjective to us to such a degree that He and we, we and He, have become one spirit. To be one spirit with the Lord is greater than to have gifts and miracles. Now that we have become one spirit with the Lord, in our daily life we need to experience being one spirit with Him.”

The following is an excerpt on “Deification in the View of the Early Church.”

Our teaching concerning man becoming God in God’s salvation must respect this distinction recognized by the church from its earliest centuries. And as the many quotations from Brother Lee’s ministry indicate, this distinction is clearly and forcefully held by us. Because of this distinction, man will never take part in the Godhead; he will never be a fourth person in the Trinity; he will never be worshipped as God. Because man will never lose his attributes as a creature, he will never be the Creator. Man will forever possess the human form and the human nature; thus, he will never be omnipresent. Man will forever be endowed with the limited mental faculties he was given by creation; hence, he will never be omniscient. God is God both outside of creation and within creation; man can at best be joined to God and thereby become God within the confines of creation.

In every way, man’s becoming God will be tempered by and limited to his status as a creature; and actually, what man is by creation gives the greatest credence to the notion that man may become God. In the account of creation in Genesis 1, all living things were created “after their kind” (vv. 11, 12, 21, 24, 25) except man. Hence, in God’s creation there are species of living things, each bearing its own characteristics that distinguish it from other species. But when the creation of man is recounted, he is not said to be created “after his kind.” Instead, the Scriptures say, “Let us [God] make man in our image, after our likeness” (Gen. 1:26). We understand this sentence to correspond to the phrase “after their kind” in the other sections of the creation account; we see it as a finer, more detailed utterance of the same notion. Hence, we understand by this sentence that man was created after God’s kind. The apostle Paul made the similar declaration to the Areopagus in Athens: “Being then the race (Gk. genos, ‘species; kind’) of God” (Acts 17:29).

Of course, we all know the sad history of man’s fall, by which man lost a great bit of his likeness to God. Nevertheless, man was created in such a way that through God’s economy man may become God. Adam before the fall was not a deified man; he was not created with God’s life and nature but only with the capacity to receive these. The fall delayed the realization of what man was created for and brought in negative elements that required our redemption. But through Christ’s salvation God’s original intention for man is fulfilled, and man becomes God in life and nature though never in the Godhead.”


  • Life-Study of Colossians, Message 51
  • The Truth Concerning the Ultimate Goal of God’s Economy, Chapter 1

Are the Teachings of Witness Lee and the Local Church biblical?

Are the teachings of Witness Lee and the Local Church biblical? Yes. Is the gospel of Witness Lee a false gospel? No. Are the Local Churches a cult? No.

On January 9, 2007, a number of evangelical Christian scholars and ministry leaders published “An Open Letter to the Leadership of Living Stream Ministry and the ‘Local Churches’” online. This caused ill-researched, inaccurate, and downright wrong information to be widely disseminated on the internet.

Since then, Living Stream Ministry and the Local Churches respectfully offer:

1. a defense of the seventeen quotations that were mishandled in the open letter

2. a detailed response to the open letter

3. their initial brief response.


Read the full defense HERE.


A Defense of Seventeen Quotations from the Ministry of Witness Lee

“We feel that we have done what the signers of the open letter should have done, that is, examine the full context of the isolated quotations as well as the larger ministry of Witness Lee on these issues before making conclusions about his teaching.

We have repeatedly shown that the isolating of these quotations presents a false witness concerning the teachings of Witness Lee.

Admittedly, our response has been lengthy, and we hope that we have not exhausted our readers with it. But for each misquotation in the open letter, we have provided ample proper quotation from Witness Lee’s ministry to show his actual position on the issues at hand. The very length of this response testifies to the abundance of material in Witness Lee’s ministry that counters the impression given by the isolating of quotations in the open letter.”


Source: The Testimony of the Local Churches and Living Stream Ministry 

See also: